Here is the test. Could a reasonably smart person, handed a thorough manual of your role, do most of your job after two weeks of study? If the honest answer is yes, AI can probably do it now or within a year. Most people, when they answer honestly, get an uncomfortable result.
This free 3-minute assessment measures how exposed your income really is to AI, not by your job title but by what your work actually consists of: how rule-based it is, what human moats protect it, where you sit in your career, and how much slack your finances give you.
13 questions. No account, no email required to see your score. This site doesn't track you.
Why trust this test?
It's built by Guustaaf Damave, who spent decades writing software until AI got better at it than he was, and who has written a weekly newsletter on AI and the economy for over two years. The scoring model comes straight from his book, The Minimum You Need to Do Before AI Changes Your Life.
He isn't selling panic. Every recommendation is something worth doing even if the disruption arrives slower than expected.
Apply the two-week test honestly: could a reasonably intelligent person, given a manual of your role, do most of it after two weeks of study? Work that passes that test is work AI can likely automate now or soon. Work that rests on years of embodied experience, real relationships, or physical presence has more runway. The test on this page turns that question into a scored, five-part reading of your specific situation.
Two waves are underway. The first hits work whose core is processing information according to rules: customer service, data entry, bookkeeping, paralegal work, basic analysis, copy editing. The second is quieter and surprises people: the entry rungs of prestige careers, junior roles in law, finance, software, and journalism, are thinning before young people can climb through them.
For now, work built on physical presence, genuine human relationships, and judgment in ambiguous situations holds up best: skilled trades, hands-on care, teaching that is truly relational, roles where the person in the room is the point. The honest caveat is that robotics is closing the physical gap on a delay, so this protection is a reprieve rather than a permanent guarantee.
It is a structured assessment, not a crystal ball. It scores what your work actually consists of against a framework drawn from two years of writing on AI and the economy, and it is honest about uncertainty: the direction of this shift is settled, the timing is not. Treat the result as a well-reasoned reading of your exposure, and a prompt to act, rather than a prediction of a date.
Yes. You get your full score and verdict with no account and no email. An optional personalized report, written for your specific answers, is available if you want a concrete plan, but the assessment itself is free and always will be.